
Banks need more transparency, says IIF
Daily news headlines
FRANKFURT – The Institute of International Finance (IIF), a global association of financial services institutions, has called for stronger risk management and an increase in transparency in the wake of the credit crisis.
Josef Ackermann, chairman of the IIF board of directors and of Deutsche Bank, said: “The leadership of our industry recognises its own responsibility to restore confidence in the financial markets, solve the problems that have arisen and prevent those problems from recurring in the future.”
Its interim report on best market practices also identified the need for better incentives and compensation, and the reform of asset valuations, liquidity management and the rating process. The crucial importance of the risk manager’s role was also highlighted. More broadly, increased board level involvement in risk management is encouraged, in order to create the necessary cultural shift towards better-used risk management.
Rick Waugh, president and chief executive officer (CEO) of Canadian Scotiabank and co-chairman of the IIF’s committee on market best practices, said: “Risk management is much more than just a monitoring function. It is a core responsibility of the CEO and all executive management. We emphasise that firms need to build risk management into their overall business strategies. The chief risk officer needs to be both a risk manager and a risk strategist, with an independent voice and as part of the highest levels of management.”
Another committee member, Cees Maas, formerly chief financial officer at ING, said the IIF was hoping to avoid too much involvement of government regulators. "Many of the problems that have arisen lend themselves to market-led solutions with the implementation of significant improvements in management areas by many individual firms. However, we recognise that there are areas where there may be benefits from further regulatory action."
The IIF launched the committee in November 2007. A final report will be issued in June.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control