Concentration risk add-ons too low at Ice and ECC, says regulator

Results of European stress test suggest shortfall of collateral for large commodities positions is equivalent to 17% of total required margin

Esma headquarters, Paris
Esma headquarters, Paris
Photo: Esma

Margins levied by Europe’s two largest energy derivatives clearing houses to account for the risks posed by an outsized position may be too low, according to the pan-European securities regulator.

The European Securities and Markets Authority published the results of its central counterparty (CCP) stress tests earlier today (July 5). All CCPs passed the stress tests, and overall had enough buffers to sustain shocks across credit, market and operational risk.

However, Esma evaluated the costs

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: