Climate risk – A new normal
The past two full years – 2017 and 2018 – were the most costly back-to-back years on record for weather-related disasters say insurance companies, with economic losses exceeding $650 billion. Moreover, 2018 was the fourth costliest year on record for weather-related events, even though there were no events on the scale of hurricanes Katrina in 2005, and Harvey, Irma and Maria in 2017.
Experts believe 2018 represents a ‘new normal’, when a large number of relatively small natural disasters added up to substantial losses.
Trying to ascertain how many of these events are the result of global climate change, and how many would have happened regardless, is extremely challenging, but historical data can certainly be applied to show that the frequency of severe weather events has increased in recent years.
Investment firm Schroders estimates global economic losses from climate change could reach $23 trillion per year in the long term if action isn’t taken. That’s almost four times the impact of the 2008 financial crisis.
But for individual firms, trying to quantify the risk of physical climate change on their assets, infrastructure, businesses and supply chains is no easy feat. While many firms are used to managing weather risk on an annual or seasonal basis, managing the long-term, ever-increasing effects of climate change requires a very different approach. It is something many firms are grappling with now, not least because shareholders and investors require greater transparency on it.
This report explores how corporates – and the banks that invest and lend to them – are approaching this new discipline. It also examines developments in disclosure – particularly those stemming from the guidelines of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
However, climate risk is not just about the economic losses caused by severe weather events, rising sea levels and higher temperatures. It is also about trying to understand how the transition to a low-carbon economy might affect businesses. Firms involved in the production of fossil fuels will be particularly affected by policy efforts to reduce carbon emissions and curb demand for the highest-polluting fuels.
Several banks have already started to model transition risk in their investment and lending portfolios although, again, this is a discipline in its infancy (see page 12).
While there are many different approaches to modelling this risk, most agree that the long time horizon and the sheer number of variables and possibilities mean that a scenario approach makes most sense.
There is also widespread agreement that assessing and managing climate risk will require the co-operation of enterprise risk and business risk managers, but it will also require them to work alongside environmental and social responsibility teams. While climate risk is identified as a top risk at many firms now, it needs to move beyond the level of public relations and ethics to a quantifiable business risk that can be communicated in a transparent and standardised way.
We hope this report provides invaluable information to companies as they embark on this journey. As ratings agency Standard & Poor’s noted at last year’s UN Climate Change Conference: “Climate change has already started to alter the functioning of our world.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Revealed: the three EU banks applying for IMA approval
BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank and Intesa Sanpaolo ask ECB to use internal models for FRTB
FICC takes flak over Treasury clearing proposal
Latest plans would still allow members to bundle clearing and execution – and would fail to boost clearing capacity, critics say
Buy side would welcome more guidance on managing margin calls
FSB report calls for regulators to review existing standards for non-bank liquidity management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies