Podcast: Acerbi on backtesting ES and FRTB’s patchwork rules
Banque Pictet quant explains a new backtesting method for expected shortfall
In this episode of Quantcast, Carlo Acerbi, head of valuation and quantitative solutions at Banque Pictet in Geneva, discusses his latest paper written with former colleague Balazs Szekely, an economic adviser at the Central Bank of Hungary in Budapest, which proposes a new backtest for expected shortfall (ES).
The new method, developed when the two quants were employed at MSCI, improves on their 2014 proposal by minimising ES backtesting’s sensitivity to the accuracy of value-at-risk prediction.
The bias to VAR predictions is inevitable, but it can be managed. By applying their method, one can not only calculate the probability of errors in the estimate, but also measure the difference between the predicted ES and the realised ES, allowing the error to be adjusted.
Acerbi also shares his views on some parts of the Basel Committee on Banking Regulation’s rules, such as the P&L attribution test, which he considers “a Russian roulette for models”.
Index
00:00 Background history of ES and backtestability
05:55 The new backtest for ES
12:18 As unbiased as possible
15:20 VAR predictions affect ES backtest
18:45 How backtests of VAR and ES compare/sharp backtest
24:10 The P&L attribution controversy
29:55 Is FRTB killing some trading strategies?
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
What futures and options say about the cost of war
Spot prices reveal major disruption, futures indicate this will pass, options imply ongoing instability
CME-FICC cross-netting terms fuel clashes
Hedge funds worried by CCP powers to suspend arrangement; clearing members say it’s standard practice
For collateral, can TINA become TIA?
US Treasuries’ dominance as collateral in repo and derivatives is no longer set in stone, argues economist
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
Op risk data: HK gets tough on takeover in $200m takedown
Also: Bank staff steal state funds in India; Vanguard settles US net zero lawsuit. Data by ORX News
CRO view: Emerging risks in the age of AI
The risk agenda is shifting beyond market and credit volatility towards operational resilience, AI governance and culture
Interest rate crosswinds buffet IRRBB teams
Political intervention and rapid-fire law changes are skewering bank models for forecasting cashflows
FRTB internal models: quo vadis?
Two risk experts explore how to adjust the FRTB framework to promote internal model usage