Back-testing expected shortfall
The discovery that expected shortfall (ES) is not elicitable propagated the belief that it could not be back-tested and aroused a number of criticisms of the Basel Committee’s adoption of ES over value-at-risk. In this article, Carlo Acerbi and Balázs Székely propose three back-testing methodologies for ES that are more powerful than the Basel VAR test, and observe that elicitability is irrelevant when it comes to the choice of a regulatory risk standard
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE ARTICLE IN FULL
Risk professionals had never heard of elicitability before 2011, when Gneiting (2011) proved that expected shortfall (ES) is not elicitable, unlike value-at-risk. This result sparked a confusing debate.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CRO view: emerging risks in the age of AI
The risk agenda is shifting beyond market and credit volatility towards operational resilience, AI governance and culture
Interest rate crosswinds buffet IRRBB teams
Political intervention and rapid-fire law changes are skewering bank models for forecasting cashflows
FRTB internal models: quo vadis?
Two risk experts explore how to adjust the FRTB framework to promote internal model usage
Rethinking post trade for OTC derivatives
LSEG’s TradeAgent platform aims to improve efficiency and resilience in post trade
The loneliness of the model risk manager
Boards may see them as a drag on innovation; risk functions need to show they embrace efficiency
US Treasuries clearing: a new era
What will the SEC’s clearing mandate mean for your firm? Explore the latest updates and analysis around clearing models, collateral requirements, risk tools and market structure
Seven developments shaping US Treasury clearing
As the SEC’s US Treasury clearing mandate approaches, FICC is rolling out new access models, protections and risk tools to help market participants prepare for a broader move into central clearing
Fireside chat: Advancing FX clearing for safer settlement
Developments in FX clearing are supporting the creation of a safer, more scalable settlement infrastructure
