FRTB: proxy risk factors may trigger model failures
Swapping non-modellable risk factors for proxies may make it harder to pass P&L attribution test
Using proxies for illiquid risk factors in regulatory capital models might prove to be a double-edged sword – potentially shrinking capital charges for market risk while increasing the possibility of model failures, market participants say.
Non-modellable risk factors (NMRFs), which are those not based on a required number and frequency of past price points, will attract whopping capital add-ons under the Basel Committee’s incoming market risk capital framework – the Fundamental Review of the
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Strategies for effective real-time data capture and robust risk management
Risk management systems, processes and real-time data aggregation techniques are rapidly evolving across financial institutions against a backdrop of high market volatility and rapid technological development
Repo clearing could spur CDM adoption – Barclays
UK bank’s tech group believes repo market is primed for new data standards
Video Q&A with Andrew Aziz, chief strategy officer and head of product, SS&C Algorithmics
In this video, Andrew Aziz, chief strategy officer and head of product at SS&C Algorithmics, discusses the key learnings to emerge from the past 12 months, the gaps that exist in banks’ ALM frameworks and the steps required to ensure a more robust…
Climate risk overlays unnerve model-validation teams
Risk Live: Model risk managers fear they lack the data or skills to properly test expert judgement
Clearing members combing rule books after LME lawsuit win
Industry debates whether other CCPs and exchanges would cancel trades if faced with similar crisis
Interest rate and liquidity risk special report 2023
This special report explores the ongoing impact of higher interest rates on bank capital and liquidity, and the steps they are taking to shore up their liquidity risk management practices in the current environment.
How higher interest rates are affecting bank liquidity
A panel of industry experts discusses the challenges posed to banks’ capital and liquidity by a persistently higher interest rate environment. They also share insights on adapting their liquidity risk management strategies, tools and technologies for a…
Hard concentration: clearing members want clarity from CCPs
FCMs complain they struggle to pass opaque margin calculations through to end-clients
