Bringing order to op risk and the duck-billed platypus
Industry co-operation on operational risk taxonomies might yield a valuable tool
Taxonomies are mostly found in biology, where they are used to classify and distinguish between different types of living organism. Using a taxonomy, species as diverse as the great-crested newt, lesser-spotted woodpecker and duck-billed platypus can be organised and arranged in a way that brings a sense of scientific order to our chaotic natural world.
In the field of operational risk management – which is often equally chaotic – taxonomies have come in very useful. The use of an op risk taxonomy, or risk register, forges a common language for the risks faced by a firm and assists with risk reporting. Perhaps more importantly, it can help firms to put in place an effective and comprehensive set of controls.
While a biological taxonomy might feature great pandas, muntjacs or spiny lumpsuckers, the entries in an op risk taxonomy are more likely to encompass internal fraud, terrorism, employee practices and workplace safety. Ideally, practitioners say that each of these risks or risk categories should be mirrored with a list of relevant controls. Against employee practices and workplace safety, for example, the controls listed might include recruitment, training or background checks.
As with many other aspects of risk management, there isn't necessarily a right or wrong way to do this. The correct taxonomy is likely to change depending on the exposure, activity and strategic objectives of your business.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision uses seven broad op risk loss event categories, but risk managers say these are far from definitive. Consequently, financial institutions have adopted different ways of tackling the issue; practitioners say banks' op risk taxonomies can include anything from 50 to 250 lower-level risks. "There's a marked variability between the different types of taxonomies used by financial services firms," remarks one London-based chief risk officer.
Still, there is much that financial firms can learn from each other. And major banks are increasingly looking to their peers for guidance on best practice. The need for co-operation in the area of op risk is perhaps all the more urgent, since banks face pressure to cut costs, boost shareholder returns and comply with onerous new regulations. If prowess in op risk management was ever viewed as a source of competitive advantage, well, things have changed.
In February, Risk.net reported that op risk practitioners from eight major banks, including Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan and HSBC, were attempting to draw up an industry standard taxonomy for use as a best-practice guide. When it comes to taxonomies, one size will never fit all, as Richard Cech, operational risk examiner at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, has pointed out. But this is nonetheless a useful step towards creating a common frame of reference.
Armed with this valuable tool, firms might be able to make the world of op risk a little less chaotic, and perhaps more similar to that of the duck-billed platypus.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Many banks yet to factor climate into credit risk models
More than a third of banks do not quantify climate risk impact on credit portfolios, study finds
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
ISITC’s Paul Fullam on the ‘anxiety’ over T+1 in Europe
Trade processing chair blames budget constraints, testing and unease over operational risk ahead of settlement move
‘The models are not bloody wrong’: a storm in climate risk
Risk.net’s latest benchmarking exercise shows banks confronting decades-long exposures, while grappling with political headwinds, limited resources and data gaps
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks