Terrorism insurance - Modelling the unthinkable

When Boston-based catastrophe modelling company AIR Worldwide placed Washington DC in the top tier of its three-tier terrorism risk assessment at the end of last year, Lawrence Mirel, the District of Columbia's chief insurance regulator, complained. Attempts to model terrorism risk are inherently unreliable, he argued, since they rely on insufficient data that purports to quantify human behaviour.

Unsurprisingly, modelling companies say this isn't the case, arguing that it is in fact possible

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: