CSFB gets OK for derivatives in China
The China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) authorised Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) to launch a financial derivatives business in China last week, reports RiskNews’ sister publication, FX Week .
The derivatives framework enables banks to trade derivatives on their own accounts for profit – previously they were only allowed to use them to hedge. Banks may also now target corporate customers. Previously, they could only offer them to other banks.
As the renminbi is not convertible on the capital account, banks that receive approval are limited to foreign currency-denominated derivatives products. They must also comply with existing regulations from other financial regulatory bodies such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission.
A spokesperson for CSFB declined to comment on what products the bank will sell, saying it has submitted a proposal to the CBRC. "We now get in-principle approval from the CBRC to engage in derivatives but we have to re-submit the plan for the product we intend to sell to Chinese clients, to the CBRC," said the spokesperson.
Under the rules, the bank can engage in interest rates, foreign exchange and credit derivatives products.
Paul Calello, chairman and chief executive officer for the Asia-Pacific at CSFB, said he envisaged demand for such products among government agencies, large domestic institutions, foreign and domestic corporates, and institutional investors.
CSFB will conduct its derivatives business in China through its Shanghai bank branch. The bank received approval from the People's Bank of China to engage in renminbi business in 1998.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
On cyber risk, tech debt is big banks’ top challenge
Risk Benchmarking: Fragmented stacks make identifying vulnerabilities harder; manual workarounds increase human errors
Trading desks urged to bolster cross-market surveillance
Artificial intelligence could help track market abuse across different instruments and venues
Clearing banks pick holes in VAR-based CCP margin models
New models ease cliff effects, but banks say they are less predictable and prone to undershooting
Hard day’s night: Kalshi’s round-the-clock enforcement head
Robert DeNault wants market-leading tech to handle up to 40 insider trading cases at a time
We won’t copy UST clearing mandate wholesale in UK – BoE
Senior official also indicates that any minimum repo haircuts will likely be calculated at portfolio level
Why Apac CROs are turning risk into strategic advantage
Resilience, agility and AI-driven analysis are becoming as important as traditional risk oversight for Apac CROs
Half of banks use scenarios to set third-party Pillar 2 capital
Risk Benchmarking study finds resilience risk less widely covered than cyber and IT disruption, but more formalised where scenarios exist
Don’t mind the gap risk: regulatory treatment of credit repacks
Gap risk in repackaging is not a credit valuation adjustment for Basel III capital purposes, argues senior quant Andrey Chirikhin