FSA issues CRD feedback
LONDON – The Financial Services Authority's (FSA) feedback on the regulations it has drafted to implement the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) has identified a wide range of issues that will require further consideration and discussion between the regulator and the industry. The feedback document on the consultation that took place on CP05/03 is a product of a "good understanding of the industry's points, although more work remains to be done", says Simon Hills, director, prudential capital and risk at the British Bankers' Association. Hills was particularly pleased with the work of the Standing and Expert groups, and the amount and quality of dialogue undertaken at an early stage, particularly compared with some other European regulators.
Within operational risk, the FSA is continuing to focus on a diverse and large number of key areas for further consideration. They are: exemption from the capital requirements for certain types of investment firms; treatment of intra-group income; treatment of outsourcing; income calculation examples; treatment of negative income; income indicator for a firm stopping or selling some of its
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Four in five banks report breaching risk appetite in past year
Risk Benchmarking: Those reporting no breaches run skinnier appetite frameworks, despite similar governance mechanisms
Slimmed-down and automated, ERM seeks a seat at the top table
Latest Risk Benchmarking exercise finds ERM growing in influence, even as headcounts shrink
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
JSCC faces pushback on plans to merge futures default funds
Members say commodities products should be kept fully segregated because of different risk profile
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets