Managing interest rate risk for non-maturity deposits
For many banks, non-maturity deposits represent a significant part of funding. However, there is still no commonly accepted approach to managing such deposits' interest rate risk. Marije Elkenbracht and Bert-Jan Nauta introduce two dynamic hedge strategies to stabilise the margin between investment return and client coupon. As extensions of Jarrow & van Deventer’s model, these strategies can be used for both interest rate risk management and funds transfer pricing
An important goal in modelling non-maturity deposits1 is to find an investment strategy that stabilises the margin independently of interest rate movements. Sales departments prefer a stable margin to help them project and manage their income accurately. The commonly used replicating portfolio model targets stabilising margins. However, this model contains a static investment rule that does not
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
SGX fortifies its defences to ward off tomorrow’s outages
Exchange operator fosters “breach mentality” to help prepare for business disruption, explains risk chief
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Macro shocks force risk reset in Asia
Measuring, managing and responding to geopolitical uncertainty and volatility
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk