Getting into the market abuse mindset
I remember mentioning the EU's Market Abuse Directive to an op risk manager at a conference in the spring. The executive – who shall remain nameless – rolled his eyes, then indicated that it was nothing to do with him.
I think he has probably now changed his mind. The UK Treasury and the Financial Services Authority were wrapping up their consultation on the directive in mid-September, and executives said their firms were preparing robust responses. What has galvanised this attention? The Citigroup bond trading scandal.
Essentially, traders at Citigroup sold about e11 billion of euro-denominated government bonds in just a few minutes in one morning in early August. The massive sale caused the price of many of the securities to fall substantially. Then, the same traders bought the securities back hours later at a tidy profit. Several days later, the FSA announced an inquiry.
Certainly, this kind of trading will be more difficult to undertake lawfully under the new EU rules, and penalties will be stiffer. Also, the reputational risks firms will suffer will be larger – already Citigroup has taken a black eye over the bond affair from clients and other City and Wall Street firms alike. Op risk managers should take notice of the Market Abuse Directive, and its potential impact on their firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Clearing firms flummoxed by new margin models at CME, Ice
VAR-based portfolio margining is easier to manage, but harder to explain
Prediction markets can be a canary in the coal mine
Prices of contracts on the likes of Polymarket can act as signals for risk management and hedging, says risk expert
EU task force boss calls on NCAs to wield their powers to meet T+1
Europe’s disparity will add to command hub’s challenge to match US co-ordination feat, says Giovanni Sabatini
Vida portfolio solutions on J.P. Morgan Markets
J.P. Morgan’s Vida portfolio solutions are being applied across financing and portfolio management, reflecting a shift towards more scalable, integrated investment infrastructure
Crypto’s missing CROs
More than two-thirds of top crypto exchanges lack a chief risk officer, although the picture is changing
How AI agents can join the dots for risk managers
Citi risk expert outlines agentic AI tool that would pull together structured and unstructured data on trading and lending approvals to create single, unified view of risk
The interplay between liquidity and collateral
The evolution of financing solutions as institutional investors raise and preserve cash
Do banks still need to validate GenAI models?
Regulators carved out GenAI models from new risk guidance. Banks shouldn’t see this as a reason to stop validating them.