S&P releases Pillar 3 guidance
Standard & Poor’s guidance aims to promote sound market discipline
Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P) has published several key areas of supplementary Pillar 3 disclosure intended to "promote sound market discipline".
For credit risk, the Proposed Supplemental Disclosures (PSD) would involve banks providing, among other things, greater disclosure of exposure at default by risk bucket, and greater breakdown of exposures by geography.
For op risk, the PSD includes a breakdown of capital charges for each risk factor, and the allocation of op risk per business line while for the trading book, the PSD includes the specific risk components, the characteristics and drivers of the Value-at-Risk, model, and stress testing. The PSD also seek additional information about the fair value of illiquid assets, the bank’s securitisation framework, the interest rate risk in the banking book, the equity portfolios outside the trading book, foreign exchange risk, and Basel Pillar 2 disclosure.
S&P also noted that in connection with Basel II it would: "refine [its] own risk-adjusted capital measures and develop a comprehensive framework that will facilitate comparison of banks’ capitalisation levels, a key factor in bank ratings."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why
How geopolitical risk turned into a systemic stress test
Conflict over resources is reshaping markets in a way that goes beyond occasional risk premia