FSA publishes modelling occasional paper
Second paper released on op risk modelling issues
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has published its second occasional paper on operational risk modelling issues. The paper set out the FSA’s views on some of the issues that firms face when modelling operational risk for Pillar I or Pillar II purposes. It focuses on three areas: simulation techniques; portability of conclusions; and the use of off-the-shelf models.
The paper categorically states that neither the FSA nor any other regulator has pre-approved any off-the-shelf model or system because they are usually built on the basis of an average firm, so the model’s relevance is diluted as the firm evolves and its risk profile changes. The FSA is keen to stress that, although an imported model is mathematically sound, care should be taken to ensure that its inputs and outputs are compatible with the manner in which the firm manages risk.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC
Op risk data: Japanese restaurant payments firm swallows $700m loss
Also: Bank of Baroda fraud filing, Wells’ Ponzi woes, and Swedbank’s Panama Papers payout. Data by ORX News
ECB finds gaps in geopolitical stress-testing frameworks
Current methods fail to properly capture impact of geopolitical stress on liquidity
How internal reporting data can strengthen governance and risk oversight
Japan’s revised whistleblower regime provides an opportunity to strengthen internal reporting arrangements
Rapid-fire repo raises hopes of cheaper, faster trading
Tokenised Treasuries piloted by DTCC could squash settlement cycles and enable 24/7 repo
