US omitted from first wave of equivalence discussions


The Committee of European Insurance and Pension Supervisors (Ceiops) has omitted the US from the first-wave equivalence negotiations, arguing its state-based regulatory structure means it "would not currently seem appropriate".

Consultation paper (CP) 81 sets out the framework for equivalence discussions – where third-party regulatory regimes are regarded as on par with Solvency II – and includes Bermuda, Switzerland and Japan (reinsurance only) in the first wave of negotiations.

In the US

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: