QIS 5 - Making political capital

With the fifth quantitative impact study looming, Ceiops has released its final advice for Solvency II’s level two implementation measures to howls of indignation from the industry. The SCR standard formula’s calibration risks driving a wedge between Ceiops and the EC, as the latter comes under pressure from its industry constituents.

Jorg Schneider

“Just because something is proposed by Ceiops, the European Commission is not obliged to accept it. We will get the views of the stakeholders and make the decision.” The comments by Karel Van Hulle, head of insurance and pensions at the European Commission’s (EC) internal markets division, encapsulates the division faced by the European insurance industry as it gets ready for the fifth quantitative impact study (QIS 5).

While the EC is the driving force behind the directive, it is the Committee

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here