A MAD idea?

Regulators are taking the Market Abuse Directive very seriously, but that doesn’t necessarily mean much is being done by the firms concerned. By Dianne See Morrison

When Graham O’Connell, director of financial services regulatory practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers, attended a recent conference on comparative law in financial regulations, one presentation struck him in particular. Appearing in one conference session together were representatives from the financial regulators of the UK, France and Germany. Each was outlining what its approach to the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) would be once it had been implemented.

O’Connell says: "When three different

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Register

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here