Banks bemoan data gap in Mifid II systematic internaliser test

Required EU trading data non-existent, dealers complain

Path unknown: some dealers say electing to become an SI is generally more hassle than it's worth

Dealers are complaining it is impossible to work out which products they trade bilaterally will be subject to controversial transparency requirements in 16 months' time. A lack of data is leaving them unable to prepare for the rule and calculate corresponding cost increases for end-users, they say.

If a bank reaches a certain market share threshold for a product as set out in the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II), it becomes a so-called systematic internaliser (SI)

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here