Sponsored by ?

This article was paid for by a contributing third party.More Information.

Running and passing the FRTB P&L attribution test

Sponsored webinar: Murex

The panel

  • Pierre Guerrier, Market risk specialist, Murex
  • Nicolae Mera, Head of FRTB and RNIV models and methodology, MLRM, Credit Suisse
  • Ridha Mahfoudhi, Head of market risk models development, National Bank of Canada
  • Adolfo Montoro, Director, Risk methodology, Deutsche Bank
  • Moderator: Tom Osborn, Editor, Risk management, Risk.net

As capital markets players realise the impact of FRTB will run deep across trading organisations, many are considering the flexibility offered by desk-level approval for the internal models approach. However, there is concern about the achievability of aligning trading and risk profit and loss sufficiently to overcome the P&L attribution test hurdle. This webinar examines this challenge, in which our panel discusses:

  • Attribution testing requirements.
  • Risk-factor selection and associated calculations – a vanilla interest rate option case study.
  • The potential differences between valuation and risk/capital model methodologies, data and configuration aligning front office and risk models.
  • Is there enough clarity on definitions regarding the P&L attribution test? What must be clarified before implementation?
  • Additional operational and market considerations affecting test effectiveness.
  • The tools that can reduce the burden of the P&L test on the risk function.
  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: