FSA fines pension-switching services £143,500 over bad advice
Customers were told to switch pensions regardless of situation or requirements, says regulator
UK pension-switching firms Perspective Financial Management (PFM) and Cricket Hill Financial Planning have been fined £49,000 and £70,000 respectively for providing unsuitable advice to customers.
Director of Cricket Hill Jeremy Sheard will also pay £24,500 in a fine. Mark Kelsey, who was responsible for compliance at the firm, was issued with a public censure.
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) says advice and sales processes at Cricket Hill had “significant problems”, alleging the firm routinely advised customers to switch their pensions to a pension fund risk management service. This occurred without sales staff first researching alternatives, and the firm was unable to demonstrate the suitability of advice provided.
The regulator also notes the firm failed to identify conflicts of interest in the process. Sheard also owned shares in the risk management service that customers were directed to, something that was never disclosed. However, the FSA says no payments ever came out of the service to either Cricket Hill or any of its employees or directors.
Similar failings occured at PFM, says the FSA. Allegedly staff at the firm would fail to research customers’ situations thoroughly before issuing advice, with the FSA specifically mentioning “details of customers’ existing pension plan, needs and objectives”.
The regulator found the firm provided unsuitable advice in five of the nine cases it reviewed. This included customers being advised to switch to almost identical pension scheme, incurring costs greater than the potential benefit, and a lack of information provided on choices. The regulator claims that, as a result, “customers could not make informed decisions about whether to switch pensions”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack
Bank of England softens tone on CCP cross-product margining
Breeden supports margin efficiencies to encourage more repo clearing, but still warns on leverage