Firms say risk management bigger, but not better
New Ernst & Young survey reveals continued risk management failings
NEW YORK - Actions taken by firms to strengthen their risk management procedures are too often proving ineffective and possibly counter-productive, a survey has revealed.
According to Ernst & Young's Future of risk survey, in which more than 500 senior executives were interviewed, 61% of respondents now say they do not plan to commit more resources to risk management over the next 12-24 months.
The survey shows the number of risk management functions has increased to keep up with compliance requirements but, despite this increase, the coverage and focus of these areas have become both increasingly difficult to manage, and the situation has been compounded by a lack of alignment.
"Although many organisations have boosted the size and reach of their risk management functions, this does not always equate to an increase in effectiveness," says Norman Lonergan, Ernst & Young's global advisory leader based in London. "Too few organisations can claim that shared reporting, data exchange and co-ordination consistently occur among their various risk management functions.
"In the end, this only leaves the organisation more vulnerable to the threat of risk."
For example, 73% of respondents indicate they have seven or more risk functions, but 67% have overlapping coverage among two or more risk functions, with half of those reporting they have gaps in terms of coverage.
"Risk management functions within an organisation often exist in silos that are disconnected from one another and the wider business strategy," says Gerry Dixon, global risk leader at Ernst & Young based in New York. "As a result, risks identified in one area might not be communicated or recognised by another. Moreover, different areas within an organisation might have different views on the severity or importance of certain risks."
Dixon adds: "Leading companies are creating a competitive advantage by using the economic downturn as an opportunity to make practical yet valuable improvements to the way risk is managed.
"More than ever, organisations need to have a comprehensive and co-ordinated risk management approach with strong executive oversight and board of director governance. The opportunity to make those changes is now."
The survey was conducted for Ernst & Young by the Economist Intelligence Unit in June and July and is available here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption