
UK Treasury issues AML rules
Anti-money laundering
The UK’s new anti-money laundering framework, which implements the EU’s Second money laundering directive, was long past its original deadline. The biggest change the new legislation brings is its application of the AML reporting framework to a host of new industries, including the legal profession, casinos, dealers of high-value goods, insurers, asset managers, accountants, estate agents, auctioneers, and other professions.
But the new rules, which must be implemented by firms by the beginning of March, also bring other changes, many of which remain controversial among bankers.
For example, one banker notes that the statutes make it possible for a money laundering information officer at a financial institution to be prosecuted under criminal law if a bank’s AML system lets a transaction slip through the cracks. "How can we be expected to recruit people for these positions if they are going to be individually prosecuted," says the source. "This is poorly drafted legislation." Indeed, owners or executives of all firms covered by the legislation would be liable for criminal prosecution if they acquire, use, or have possession of criminal property -- essentially putting the burden of proof on firms to show that payments they have received or assets they are managing, for example, are not the result of criminal activity.
The new rules also require banks to take proof and make copies of the identification of all new customers, and have a robust AML system in place. The text of the legislation mirrors recent discussion papers and other work by the Financial Services Authority in this area.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
SEC cyber rules risk creating web of confusion and costs
Proposals would require breach notifications, public disclosures and annual cyber assessments
Indonesia readies close-out netting after passing P2SK Law
Bankruptcy law changes remove close-out netting obstacles
Behnam comments fan JSCC hopes for US client clearing
Japan clearing exec welcomes CFTC chair’s pledge to keep discussing OTC clearing status for non-US houses
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
SVB wouldn’t happen in Europe, says Deutsche CIB head
Campelli also thinks Credit Suisse’s bailed-in AT1 bonds acted as originally intended
How Finma milked Credit Suisse’s CoCos to close UBS deal
An unusual clause in Swiss AT1 bonds allowed them to be written off, but could others follow suit?
Fed’s climate stress test whips up storm for banks
Long-awaited US climate risk exercise puts tough pressure on banks’ data and models