Sponsor's article > The point of op risk

The inclusion of an explicit operational risk component in the proposed Basel II Capital Accord has caused widespread controversy. Much of this has surrounded the feasibility of accurately measuring, or even defining, such risk. In this first of three columns, David Rowe argues that a more important goal should be to improve the consistency of banks’ internal process execution.

More than 50 years ago, following their country’s defeat in World War II, some forward-looking Japanese business leaders sought ways to boost the country’s economic recovery. In their search to achieve a competitive edge, they believed improved product quality was a key requirement. At the time, to put it bluntly, ‘Made in Japan’ was a joke, synonymous with cheap products and shoddy workmanship. In seeking to change that reputation, Japanese business leaders were impressed by the work of a

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here