Introduction: Focus on the USA
The US has long been viewed as the holy grail for structured products professionals. And if the upbeat mood of last month's Structured Products Association (SPA) meeting is anything to go by, structurers and distributors in the country could be on to a winner.
Companies like Florida-based Countrywide Financial believe investors are warming to the industry and are preparing themselves to be in a leading position when demand rises. Similarly, regional powerhouses like California's Wells Fargo are looking to make the most of their impressive distribution networks.
Growth of the market could also be aided by some impending regulatory changes. Speaking at the SPA event, a number of lawyers said they expect wide-ranging reform proposals that will affect the way structured products issued as securities are communicated to clients and regulators. The changes, which will affect the 'shelf' registration process, will mostly change the nature of MTN programmes and unlisted notes registered with the US Securities & Exchange Commission.
Effectively, the anticipated reforms will include a new category of provider – the WKSI (the well-known seasoned issuer), essentially large investment banks with large note programmes. WKSIs will have no SEC review process and will be able to make use of subsidiaries to provide guarantees.
It could be an exciting development, but, as some lawyers correctly point out, more than a few filing issues remain to be resolved.
Paul Lyon
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards