Companies often misinformed about the real threat to e-commerce security
LONDON -- Company executives are often misinformed about the real vulnerability of their network systems, according to a survey of electronic commerce fraud by professional services firm KPMG.
KPMG says it is well documented that a company is at greater risk of being the victim of an internal security breach than an external one. But KPMG’s 2001 Global e-Fr@ud Survey of the world’s largest companies across 12 countries showed that half the firms regard computer hackers and poor security policies as the greatest threats to their e-commerce systems.
Seventy-nine percent of respondents said the highest probability of a breach occurring to an e-commerce system would be via the internet or other external access.
But KPMG says poorly trained and poorly qualified system administrators, poor reporting procedures for security breaches or dishonest employees are often a greater threat.
E-fraud is a growing problem for companies around the world, although reported instances of e-fraud are low, KPMG notes. Only 9% of respondents to the survey said a security breach had occurred in their organisation in the past 12 months.
And, where breaches had occurred, legal action was not always pursued for a variety of reasons, such as inadequate legal remedies and lack of evidence.
The use of good computer forensic response guidelines could significantly increase the likelihood of an organisation securing enough evidence to take legal action, KPMG says.
Respondents indicated overwhelmingly that security of credit card numbers and personal information were by far the most important concerns for their customers. But less than 35% of respondents reported having security audits performed on their e-commerce systems. Only 12% of respondents reported that their website bears a seal identifying that their e-commerce system had passed a security audit.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor
EU states take the slow road to new cross-border services ban
Late national transposition hampers foreign banks’ decisions on location of affected activities
Don’t mention the rules: the fight against prediction market abuse
For the CFTC to regulate new venues effectively, it must first redefine insider trading
Can the US FRTB revamp make the IMA great again?
Banks are finally presented with a viable internal models framework under Basel III’s market risk rules
UK rethinking tougher capital rules for US bank subsidiaries
US endgame draft would trigger UK Basel III trap floor for foreign banks, but PRA is reviewing
EBA proposes drastic overhaul to supervisory data reporting
Revamp will cut back the number of datapoints and integrate overlapping reports
CFTC wants to regulate prediction markets. Is it up to the task?
Former officials echo state gambling authorities’ concerns over agency’s ability to police betting risks
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”