UK watchdog will not pressure banks on advanced Basel II
The UK’s principal financial market watchdog will not pressure banks to adopt the advanced approaches to measuring risk capital under the Basel II banking Accord, UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) managing director Michael Foot said today.
Foot said the FSA had begun discussions with banking industry groups on the FSA’s plans to implement the standardised and advanced approaches to measuring operational risk, and on the internal ratings-based credit risk proposals of Basel II.
The complex and risk-based Basel II bank capital adequacy Accord proposes a range of simple to complex ways of measuring the risks faced by major banks to determine how much capital they should set aside to guard against risk.
Foot said the FSA would try to get the same message about not pressurising banks across to other national bank regulators.
He said the aim is easy enough to state – local flexibility for particular circumstances and broad consistency between countries on the main issues. “But no-one thinks the outcome will be easy to achieve,” he said.
Global banking regulators hope to introduce Basel II by the end of 2006. The European Commission wants to apply new capital adequacy rules closely modelled on Basel II to all banks and investment firms in the European Union, of which the UK is one of 15 member states.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline
Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities