UK FSA fines firm £560,000 for breaches
LONDON – The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined W Deb MVL (WDM) £560,000 for widespread failings in its systems and controls, which resulted in poor accounting systems and inadequate client money protection. The failings, according to the FSA, occurred over a four and a half year period from December 2001 to May 2005.
"The implementation and maintenance of appropriate systems and controls is essential to maintaining market and consumer confidence in the financial system and individual firms," says Margaret Cole, head of enforcement at the regulator. "A firm that fails to meet these basic requirements can pose significant risks to its clients and ultimately its own financial health."
Overall, the FSA found that WDM had breached four of the FSA Principles for Business as well as relevant FSA rules on client money. The primary effect of these failures was that WDM was unable to monitor its own financial position or to comply with its financial reporting requirements adequately, said the FSA in a statement. This resulted in the firm making total provisions of £66.3 million in its accounts for 2004 and 2005 in respect of assets viewed as irrecoverable. These provisions in turn led to concerns about the firm's solvency and to its former parent company, ING, waiving loans totalling £58 million to ensure it remained adequately capitalised.
Cole adds: "In determining the level of penalty, the FSA has taken into account the fact that WDM and ING identified potential regulatory issues at the firm in 2005 and acted properly and responsibly in reporting these to the FSA. The firm, ING and, since it acquired the firm, Evolution Group plc, have been open and co-operative with the FSA in bringing this investigation to a prompt conclusion."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint