SEC to revamp whistle-blower process
Following a series of failures to spot large-scale fraud, the SEC is moving to improve handling of whistle-blowing and enforcement tips
In its bid to improve the enforcement process, the SEC has enlisted the services of the Center for Enterprise Modernization, a federally funded research and development centre, to begin immediately working with the SEC to conduct a comprehensive review of internal procedures used to evaluate tips, complaints and referrals. The agency is seeking to establish a more centralised process that will more effectively identify valuable leads for potential enforcement action as well as areas of high risk for compliance examinations.
"As we continue to reinvigorate our enforcement efforts as an agency, it's vitally important that we move very aggressively to improve staff's use of tips and complaints from investors and whistle-blowers," said Schapiro. "This comprehensive review will help us identify and improve areas within the agency where gaps or lack of communication may cause breakdowns that prevent us from ensuring swift and vigorous enforcement."
The SEC typically receives hundreds of thousands of tips and complaints per year from investors and the general public as well as from those the SEC regulates, including broker-dealers, investment advisers and public companies. These communications come through a variety of means, including web forms, email, phone calls, mail, messengers and faxes. Tips and complaints can come into several different divisions and offices within the SEC's Washington, DC, headquarters, and each of the SEC's 11 regional offices around the country. The SEC also receives referrals from self-regulatory organisations (SROs), other government agencies, and foreign regulators.
The SEC's review will scrutinise the agency's processes for receiving, tracking, analysing and acting upon the tips, complaints and referrals from these outside sources. The goal of the review is to improve the efficiency, effectiveness and overall management of how the agency addresses tips, complaints and referrals, and how SEC staff utilise the information received to protect investors.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos