CFTC slap $32 million in fines on 'FX swindlers'
In mid-April, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) granted a permanent injunction against Ronald Steven Holt and three associated companies for financial misdemeanours, while fining them a total of $32 million.
The businesses – the International Funding Association and Global Management Group, from Arizona, and Cambridge Global Group – were fined $32 million.
The fines amount to the settling of a debt that was raised when Holt was initially found guilty of defrauding customers in 2003.
Gregory Mocek, director of the CFTC's division of enforcement, said the case demonstrates the high priority placed on pursuing "foreign currency swindlers" and freezing their assets to give back to retail victims. However, he said customers also need to be aware of the dangers: "Customers should not enter into investments with blindfolds on and expect that everyone in the market-place is legitimate," he said.
The CFTC charged that since 1997, Holt and his businesses fraudulently solicited around $25 million from roughly 2,500 clients for trading futures contracts, including foreign currencies. These included using false claims that he achieved investment returns of 7–10% per month.
The order also found that the defendants traded illegal futures contracts and misappropriated at least $14 million of the clients' $25 million.
The commission said the defendants used the funds to purchase residential property and various items. They were held to be jointly and severally liable to pay a judgment totalling nearly $32 million. This comprises over $14 million for repayment to defrauded customers, around $1.5 million in interest and approximately $16 million in monetary penalties. OR&C
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
In simplifying credit risk models, EBA could compound capital costs
Skipping hard yards of internal ratings-based approach might trip higher capital charges and implementation costs
Change fatigue could dim EBA’s credit risk simplicity drive
Revisions may be kept to a minimum as short-term implementation burden weighs on banks
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’