Jeffries & Co charged by SEC over illegal gifts and expenses
The US Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged registered broker-dealer Jeffries & Co and two of its executives – Scott Jones and Kevin Quinn – in connection with illegal gifts and entertainment expenses.
According to the SEC, Quinn, Jeffries' former senior vice-president and equity-sales trader, was hired in May 2002 to increase the firm's brokerage business with a family of mutual funds managed by an adviser with whom Quinn had an existing relationship.
Quinn's compensation package included a $1.5 million annual travel and entertainment budget, which was spent on travel, entertainment and lavish gifts for some of its most successful equity traders. The list of gifts included Broadway shows, private jets and in one case, payment for a trader's bachelor party.
Brokers are barred from compensating mutual fund traders for brokerage business under Section 17(e)(1) of the Investment Company Act, and under Section 17(a)(1) and Rule 17a-3 of the Exchange Act.
Walter G. Ricciardi, deputy director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, said: "The traders' loyalty and allegiance are owed solely to investors, and such compensation may harm investors by impairing the traders' objective judgment. Here, Mr. Quinn lavished gifts and excessive entertainment on select equity traders to improperly sway the flow of brokerage business. Jeffries and Mr. Jones [the firm's director of equities] failed to properly supervise Mr. Quinn."
The firm, Jones and Quinn have agreed to the SEC's institution of settled enforcement proceedings, which involves substantial fines and a bar on Quinn's future employment in the financial industry. Jeffries was suspended for three months from acting in a supervisory capacity for any broker or dealer, and was ordered to pay a $5.5 million penalty to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive
Fed to move tailored-capital goalposts soon, says Bowman
Banks hope agencies will index triggers for harsher capital rules to economic growth
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
Move that would allow companies to opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures welcomed
EU lawmaker calls for review of Luxembourg’s cross-border rules
Grand Duchy accused of side-stepping rules aimed at prising away banking business from London
Un-American or un-JPM? Surcharge rethink divides G-Sibs
Some see sense in rethink to funding indicator, others call for a backtrack