Rogue traders cost Calyon $358 millon in fines
NEW YORK - Rogue traders at Calyon in New York, the investment-banking arm of Credit Agricole, have been making unauthorised bets on credit markets. The bank is now subject to a $347.5 million decline in third-quarter profits.
The traders from the proprietary trading desk - which uses the bank's balance sheet to take bets on stocks, bonds and indexes - established a large position at the end of August centred on certain credit market indexes, but the trade was executed above the authorised limit and without the bank's authority. Risk managers were only notified when they returned to work after the Labor Day weekend.
Speaking to UK newspaper The Times, a Calyon spokesperson said: "The relevant disciplinary measures have been taken. The trading limit alert and security controls were immediately strengthened in order to prevent any such incident happening in the future."
Critics have been quick to highlight the investment bank's failure to meet the basic requirements of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive in its risk management procedures.
UK director of software vendor ILOG financial services, Geoff Round, says: "This story clearly demonstrates the value of business rules in regulatory and compliance projects at investment banks. The fact that it took so long for risk managers at Calyon to be made aware of the rogue trading is not only worrying financially for the company, but also poses questions about investment banks' ability to identify high-risk trading practices as stipulated in the Mifid regulatory framework."
For now the credit rating agencies have kept Calyon's rating stable but they will be reassessing the bank's risk and compliance functions. Both Moody's and Fitch Ratings have indicated their concern over apparent weaknesses in Calyon's risk management systems and both will be monitoring the situation closely in the coming weeks. They might consider a negative action rating.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos