Iosco releases recommendations for hedge fund supervision
Hedge fund oversight guidelines are the subject of the latest paper issued by Iosco
The paper says it looks to mitigate risks of trading and lack of transparency traditionally associated with hedge funds and asset managers - dubbed the shadow banking industry by supervisors.
"The recent financial crisis is not a hedge fund crisis, and indeed regulators recognise that hedge funds contribute to market liquidity, price efficiency, risk distribution and global market integration," said Kathleen Casey, chairman of Iosco's Technical Committee. "However, recent market events have given governments and regulators the opportunity to consider the possible role hedge funds may play in amplifying crises through their trading strategies, reliance on leverage and the need to liquidate positions quickly."
The report was prepared by the Technical Committee's Task Force on Unregulated Financial Entities, co-chaired by Italian prudential regulator Consob and the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA).
Iosco says it has presented its findings to the G-20 Working Group on Enhancing Sound Regulation and Strengthening Transparency, ahead of the meeting by G-20 national leaders in London on April 2.
The guidelines come as US and European regulators are looking to supervise funds more closely, as their role in the unfolding crisis has become more pronounced - from frauds such as Bernard Madoff's $50 billion ponzi, to the impact of short selling on financial stability.
The closing date for submissions to the consultation report is April 30, 2009.
The recommendations may be read here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises