Incentives needed to push SEPA implementation
World Payments Report warns firms unlikely to meet SEPA deadline
LONDON – The required amount of SEPA payment instruments is unlikely to be in place by the end of 2011, unless regulators provide incentives to mobilise European public administrations and corporations to adopt them, says the third annual World Payments Report 2007(2), published by Capgemini, ABN Amro, and the European Financial Management & Marketing Association (EFMA).
The Single European Payment Area (SEPA) initiative – which comes into force for credit transfers from January 1, 2008, with critical mass being attained by 2010 – aims to harmonise national payment systems to provide an efficient and simple means for making cross-border credit transfers, direct debits, and credit and debit card payments in euros from any country in the European Union.
The report, which considers world payments trends with a particular emphasis on SEPA, says that if the public sector contributed 29% of the required volumes to reach critical mass for the new SEPA credit transfers and direct debits, and if corporate payments volumes for these instruments were added, the required critical mass of SEPA transactions could be reached or even exceeded by 2010.
"Many domestically focused corporations are reluctant to work towards SEPA implementation, arguing that it should be the responsibility of banks and regulators to fulfil their business requirements. Regulatory as well as business incentives are therefore vital to attract these parties to act," says Patrick Desmares, secretary general of EFMA.
The report analysed SEPA implementation and migration plans published earlier in 2007 for the 13 current eurozone countries and found that none expects to achieve a critical mass of SEPA payments before the agreed deadline in just over three years. Some countries would even like to retain legacy payments as long as demand exists.
Report analysis and interviews conducted with European banks for the 2007 report confirm last year's findings: that banks will see direct payments revenues decline by between 38% and 62% in some parts of the market by 2012.The report suggests that, to stay competitive in the new payments landscape, banks will need to reassess their operating models in Europe, and it says many banks will need to outsource at least part of their payments activities. Around 58% of banks already plan to, or are, outsourcing all or part of their payments activities in the next five years, and 68% plan to offshore this activity as well.
The report also found that: cash remains the predominant payment instrument in Europe; there are still no clear initiatives to replace cash to reduce the cost of cash to society; Europe needs a solution that allows any card to be used at any terminal; the card market is growing at over 10% year and will remain the leading non-cash payment instrument; banks should consider forming a new European debit card scheme to replace existing national schemes; the payments institutions created under the Payment Services Directive are unlikely to present a serious competitive threat for banks until 2011; the top 10 banks in the 2012 European market will each process around five billion transactions a year; and banks are repositioning their business models and turning to open architectures to enhance product offerings, outsource/insource payments and provide integrated services to their clients.
Copies of the report are available for download at www.capgemini.com/wpr07.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Industry calls for major rethink of Basel III rules
Isda AGM: Divergence on implementation suggests rules could be flawed, bankers say
Saudi Arabia poised to become clean netting jurisdiction
Isda AGM: Netting regulation awaiting final approvals from regulators
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
CFTC chair backs easing of G-Sib surcharge in Basel endgame
Isda AGM: Fed’s proposed surcharge changes could hike client clearing cost by 80%
UK investment firms feeling the heat on prudential rules
Signs firms are falling behind FCA’s expectations on wind-down and liquidity risk management
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Bank of Communications moves early to meet TLAC requirements
China Construction Bank becomes last China G-Sib to release TLAC plans
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites