
NYSE firm fined for illegal broker payments
LOSSES & LAWSUITS
The firm's stock loan department has since been closed for the supervisory deficiencies and books and records violations that led to the misconduct. NYSE Regulation alleges that the firm's stock loan department engaged in numerous transactions at away-from-market rebate rates, and made payments to finders who performed no legitimate business function.
VDM completely lacked supervision of its stock loan business resulting in millions of dollars in fees being improperly channelled to finders who did nothing to earn them, according to Susan L. Merrill, chief of enforcement at NYSE Regulation. "Firms must ensure that services are being engaged for bona fide business purposes, and must have independent controls to verify that services paid for have actually been performed," she said.
NYSE Regulation charges that from January through December 2004, the employees of VDM's stock loan department borrowed securities from complicit counterparties at rebate rates significantly below the prevailing market rebate rates for those securities, and then loaned those securities to third parties at higher rebate rates including market rates.
The difference between the below-market rates at which the securities were borrowed and the higher rates at which the securities were loaned represented the firm's gross revenues on these transactions. These actions violate Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 thereunder, and NYSE Rules 342, 440 and 476(a)(6).
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Regulation
Regulation
French regulator questions need for share trading equivalence
Esma’s reinterpretation ahead of Brexit reduces need for equivalence system, says AMF official
Receive this by email