Could prime of primes go pop?
The PoP market is booming, but some tier one banks are wary
Prime brokerage has had its share of bad headlines in recent years, but at least one corner of the industry is booming: so-called prime of primes (PoPs) catering to foreign exchange traders.
PoPs act as credit intermediaries in currency markets, connecting clients such as retail brokers and smaller hedge funds to tier one liquidity providers. Some claim to be experiencing double-digit growth, both in trade volume and client numbers. Saxo Bank, one of the largest providers of PoP services, said in a recent investor relations report that its total client base has grown more than 230% since 2018.
This presents something of a conundrum for the largest banks. Many of them cut ties with scores of less creditworthy clients after the 2015 Swiss franc de-pegging inflicted substantial losses on retail brokers and hedge funds. Another round of client-cutting followed when the 2018 collapse of the GTEC Pandion hedge fund left Citi with a $180 million loss. Now, many of these same clients are finding their way back into the fold via PoPs.
Within large banks, opinions about PoPs are mixed. Some say they play a useful role in diffusing risk. Because PoPs consolidate the flows of lots of small clients that often have offsetting positions, their business tends to be more balanced and diversified than many of the larger customers that tier one banks deal with directly.
Others say that banks should not be taking indirect exposure to end-clients they wouldn’t do business with directly.
For now, plenty of banks are eager to do business with PoPs. But it is understood that at least two of the world’s largest FX prime brokers have decided to steer clear of them, at least for the time being. A blow-up could send many more running for the hills.
As more providers enter the market, some see a potential shaking out of PoPs into their own tiers
PoPs are well aware of the need to maintain the confidence of large banks. The top firms are investing heavily in customer due diligence and risk management systems. But as more and more brokers get into the business, competition is intensifying, with some PoPs offering greater amounts of leverage to attract customers.
As more providers enter the market, some see a potential shaking out of PoPs into their own tiers, with smaller players primed by the larger PoPs that have direct relationships with tier one banks. That could make it even more difficult for large banks to monitor and manage the risks posed by this client base.
There is little doubt that PoPs are playing an important role in the market in filling the void left by retrenching banks. Many are highly reputable, with strong risk management and first-class systems. They provide a crucial service to smaller firms and are more attuned to the needs of these clients.
Their emergence could make the FX market safer and more robust. But after years spent de-risking their FX prime brokerage operations, some banks are clearly worried that if things went wrong, this new breed of clientele could put them right back where they started.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
SpaceX gives CME’s single-stock futures a much-needed boost
New contracts could take off as IPO bolt-on to S&P 500 contracts
Bank vs non-bank: FX’s two-tier reality
CME and LSEG data show banks provide sticky and broad liquidity, while non-banks cling tightly to the price
Have regulators gone soft on enforcement? (And should we care?)
US agencies are scaling back punishments for technical rule breaches, raising concerns that small but crucial risks may be ignored
Beyond FX HedgePool: what’s next for all-to-all?
Proponents see bright future for trading model, but obstacles to take-up remain
Basel’s CVA upgrade: persuasive in the US, less so in Europe
Ban on credit risk models could encourage US banks to adopt more sophisticated CVA method
Is alt data betting on prediction markets?
While offering a rich source of new data, legal uncertainties remain
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Private credit disclosures leave more questions than answers
Muddled metrics and scattergun reporting hinder comparison of US lenders