
Could prime of primes go pop?
The PoP market is booming, but some tier one banks are wary
Prime brokerage has had its share of bad headlines in recent years, but at least one corner of the industry is booming: so-called prime of primes (PoPs) catering to foreign exchange traders.
PoPs act as credit intermediaries in currency markets, connecting clients such as retail brokers and smaller hedge funds to tier one liquidity providers. Some claim to be experiencing double-digit growth, both in trade volume and client numbers. Saxo Bank, one of the largest providers of PoP services, said in a recent investor relations report that its total client base has grown more than 230% since 2018.
This presents something of a conundrum for the largest banks. Many of them cut ties with scores of less creditworthy clients after the 2015 Swiss franc de-pegging inflicted substantial losses on retail brokers and hedge funds. Another round of client-cutting followed when the 2018 collapse of the GTEC Pandion hedge fund left Citi with a $180 million loss. Now, many of these same clients are finding their way back into the fold via PoPs.
Within large banks, opinions about PoPs are mixed. Some say they play a useful role in diffusing risk. Because PoPs consolidate the flows of lots of small clients that often have offsetting positions, their business tends to be more balanced and diversified than many of the larger customers that tier one banks deal with directly.
Others say that banks should not be taking indirect exposure to end-clients they wouldn’t do business with directly.
For now, plenty of banks are eager to do business with PoPs. But it is understood that at least two of the world’s largest FX prime brokers have decided to steer clear of them, at least for the time being. A blow-up could send many more running for the hills.
As more providers enter the market, some see a potential shaking out of PoPs into their own tiers
PoPs are well aware of the need to maintain the confidence of large banks. The top firms are investing heavily in customer due diligence and risk management systems. But as more and more brokers get into the business, competition is intensifying, with some PoPs offering greater amounts of leverage to attract customers.
As more providers enter the market, some see a potential shaking out of PoPs into their own tiers, with smaller players primed by the larger PoPs that have direct relationships with tier one banks. That could make it even more difficult for large banks to monitor and manage the risks posed by this client base.
There is little doubt that PoPs are playing an important role in the market in filling the void left by retrenching banks. Many are highly reputable, with strong risk management and first-class systems. They provide a crucial service to smaller firms and are more attuned to the needs of these clients.
Their emergence could make the FX market safer and more robust. But after years spent de-risking their FX prime brokerage operations, some banks are clearly worried that if things went wrong, this new breed of clientele could put them right back where they started.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Our take
GFXC to entice buy-side code adoption with ESG tie-ups
Rating agency partnerships would link FX code adoption to ESG scores
Clock ticking on UK plan for regulatory reforms
Changes to SMCR and short-selling rules least likely to be completed before next election
How did EU regulators miss the FTX horror story?
Gruesome accounting practices and a questionable cast: plenty of grounds to reject Mifid licence
ARRC’s trivial fight over term SOFR use
Toyota’s ABS deal should not derail effort to expand use of term rate in derivatives
What happens when a bank drops off the systemic risk radar?
Russia’s Sberbank skipped this year’s G-Sib assessment. But just because a bank is invisible doesn’t mean it no longer poses a risk
Degree of influence 2022: in the grip of volatility
Rough volatility, liquidity and trade execution were quants’ top priorities this year
China congress brings new risks to foreign bank JVs
New political risks add to existing challenges for fully controlled ventures in the country
Crypto structured products come of age
After some growing pains, the space is now offering the type of structures seen in TradFi equities markets