Skip to main content

One thing missing from US Basel III proposal: a deadline

Without a deadline, risk teams will struggle to secure resources to begin implementation projects

Several calendar pages are strewn on a table, with a person’s arms resting on the table with clasped hands, showing a decision must be made

Banks found much to cheer in the Basel III endgame proposal issued by US regulators on March 19. The one thing missing was a deadline to jumpstart implementation.

“The lack of a go-live date was surprising,” says a market risk manager at a US bank. 

Regulators generally suggest a go-live date when proposing new rules, although US prudential agencies haven’t always done so in the past. An earlier

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here