Energy Risk presents the Future of Carbon Trading Round Table
With carbon prices plunging both the Europe and the US as the fragile global economy takes place Energy Risk is speaking to key players within the industry regarding the future of the carbon markets and what developments are foreseen in the future
Topics for discussion include:
- Is it helpful to the ETS that individual EU countries enact their own carbon reduction measures beyond the scheme’s scope?
- What is going to happen to the EU ETS post 2020?
- To what extent will the aviation sector take part in emissions trading?
- Will there be a change in the level of the emissions cap?
- What measures can/will be taken which would lead to a carbon price that incentivises real emissions reductions rather than just the purchase of cheap credits.
- With Canada pulling out of the Kyoto protocol on climate change do you see further countries following suit, what is the future for other participants?
- How will the power sector adjust when it has to purchase all allowances from auctions?
- Is there a price where carbon trading becomes merely a compliance activity for polluters?
- Are you optimistic about the future of the carbon market?
Click here to register to view the 'Energy Risk presents the Future of Carbon Trading Round Table'
Speakers include:
- Mark Owen-Lloyd, Energy Trader, CF PARTNERS
- Benedikt von Butler, Director for Environmental Products, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS LIMITED
Click here to view further information on our speakers.
In association with CF Partners
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Why AI agents are like staff you can’t trust
Uncertainty implicit in GenAI systems means risk managers have to take a more adversarial approach
Regulatory risk aversion contributed to SVB failure – Bowman
Supervisors ‘knew, or should have known’ about risks a year before bank’s collapse, says Fed vice-chair
As LLMs spread, quants confront ‘lexical risk’
Users are finding the uncertainty in GenAI models is hard to measure
Risk managers go softly-softly on AI adoption
ERM teams still in testing mode for most AI use cases, latest Risk Benchmarking study shows
Limit band risks stale prices in 24/7 markets, SEC warned
Roundtable participants say proposed restrictions could leave stocks trading at unrealistic values
Most banks embed risk appetite into business decisions
Risk Benchmarking: Second line more likely to be shut out when it comes to product launches or market entry
Op risk data: KKR crushes antitrust fine record over pre-merger filing fails
Also: Dealers pay up for Mexican bond-rigging scandal; missing AML checks at UBS. Data by ORX News
Four in five banks report breaching risk appetite in past year
Risk Benchmarking: Those reporting no breaches run skinnier appetite frameworks, despite similar governance mechanisms
