Editor's letter
Just as a company's Christmas party is often a gauge of the financial success (or otherwise) of the organisation that year, so the parties that take place during London's IP Week every February are a good reflection of the energy industry's financial health. So it can only be good news that this year, IP Week registered its highest turnout ever. Almost 2,500 energy industry executives from around the world attended, according to the Energy Institute, and the whole event was, I'm reliably informed by veteran traders and brokers, more like the days of old in the boom times of the 1980s.
How much things can change in a year. I remember that last year, the Intercontinental Exchange's party was shunned by IPE brokers who were disgruntled with the exchange's drive to go electronic. They flocked to the Nymex party instead. This year, Ice's party was a raging success, a larger do than that put on by Nymex.
Some of last year's stalwarts of open-outcry trade are now banging the drum (or rather hitting the keyboard) for electronic order execution. As electronic exchange trade spreads through energy trading, so automation in trade capture, straight-through processing and middle office processes is also progressing. We discover which software companies are at the front of that drive, and where they were ranked by end-users in our Energy Risk software rankings poll on p.14.
The other trend grabbing headlines this year is the M&A activity of utility companies around the globe. At the time of writing, Gas Natural and E.ON are battling to buy Endesa, Suez and Gaz de France are set to merge, National Grid is taking over KeySpan and speculation is rife that General Electric and Macquarie Bank are vying to buy a stake in TXU. We'll be looking into this latest round of mergers and asking what it means for liberalisation and competition in these markets in our next issue.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos