CEBS: bank disclosures lack detail
The level of disclosure in the 2008 annual reports of major banks was better than the preceding year, but there is still much room for improvement, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (Cebs) said on May 28.
In a public hearing held in London, Cebs laid out its findings from an assessment of the reports of 17 major banks, three of which were US firms. It concluded that, while "some tangible improvements compared with the previous year have been noted, the observation does not fit for all financial institutions as the level of disclosures appear rather heterogeneous".
Disclosures in certain sections of banks' reports were considered "too generic" and "may justify further attention". By way of example, Cebs said banks were not providing enough details of the methods they use to calculate gains on their own credit risk. While some banks recorded large one-off gains in the first quarter due to spreads widening on holdings of their own debt - reversing substantial Q4 losses - Cebs noted only one firm explained these gains would reverse if the market picked up.
Other areas where greater disclosure is needed include mark-to-model valuations, impairment of assets at goodwill, more granular information on guarantors, such as credit derivatives product companies, and liquidity risk.
Furthermore, although banks provided detailed information regarding their exposures, the assumptions and quantitative models used to value instruments such as collateralised debt obligations, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities tend not to be described in sufficient detail.
Cebs concluded that many banks tried to avoid disclosing quantitative methodology and assumptions by saying the information was confidential.
Following its assessment and comments made on Wednesday by market participants, Cebs intends to prepare a report on disclosure and release it for public consultation at the end of June.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EBA seeks to allay Simm divergence concerns
EU validator pledges to co-ordinate with global regulators, but retains ability to act alone “if needed”
FRTB models find salvation in US Basel III proposal
Changes to P&L attribution test and NMRFs make IMA viable for US banks, risk managers say
US blows the floors off Basel III
Barr criticises “downward deviations” in US rule; Bowman rejects “blind adherence” to global standards
Basel III endgame – a timeline
A review of Risk.net’s coverage of the US implementation saga
Leaked EU plans offer extra temporary relief for FRTB models
Risk factors would need only two observations to be modellable. Do changes foreshadow US Basel III?
Iosco chief talks cyber, AI and clearing
Buenaventura discusses Iosco’s role in aiding market resilience and cross-border co-operation
US regulators bid to save FRTB IMA, but it’s no small task
Even if industry wish-list is granted, a 2028 start date might be too soon for model adoption
Hopes rise for cross-product netting under SA-CCR
Banks want rule change in Basel III endgame to lower capital costs of clearing UST repos