Basel II NPR to be delayed
WASHINGTON, DC – US federal banking agencies may revisit the Basel II implementation timeline, after additional analysis of the quantitative impact study four (QIS4) results. The additional analysis will delay the release of the Basel II Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) beyond the original mid-2005 schedule.
The QIS4 submissions evidence material reductions in the aggregate minimum required capital for the QIS4 participant population, and significant dispersion of results across institutions and portfolio types. "Additional work is necessary to determine whether these results reflect differences in risk, reveal limitations of QIS4, identify variations in the stages of bank implementation efforts (particularly related to data availability), and/ or suggest the need for adjustments to the Basel II framework," the agencies said in a statement dated April 29.
The agencies received QIS4 submissions from participating institutions in January and have completed a preliminary analysis. They were due to release the NPR at mid-year 2005, but have delayed it to "better assess the results of the recently completed QIS4". They will issue the NPR at the earliest possible date after considering issues raised by the QIS4 results.
A hearing will also be held in the House of Representatives on May 11, titled Basel II – Capital Changes in the US Banking System and the Results of the Impact Study. Congress wants to get increasingly involved in the new regulations, after intensive industry lobbying focused on the op risk charge and potential competitive implications.
Indeed, just three weeks prior to the agency announcement, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s Kevin Bailey said the NPR would be delivered in June or July at the annual OpRiskUSA conference in New York in early April. Bailey, who is the deputy comptroller for capital and regulatory policy, said: "At the same time as the NPR for Basel II, US agencies will be also be publishing an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) describing potential revisions to the existing Basel I capital adequacy regulations for those institutions not adopting Basel II. It is our clear intent – especially for institutions who are considering opting into Basel II – to show what exactly their options are."
However, Bailey denied that the new framework for Basel I banks would be a "mini Basel II. It is a process that is going to be building on the existing Basel I base of capital adequacy regulations," he said. "We will not have a mini-IRB, and there will not be an op risk charge in this proposal."
Bailey also said revised supervisory guidance for the advanced measurement approach would be published in 2005, and the final rules will be put in place in mid-year 2006. The impact that the delay of the NPR would have on these other target dates was unclear at press time. OpRisk
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
EU officials tamp down hopes for bank capital relief
Capital cuts are not a done deal in EC’s review of competitiveness, despite US deregulation
EU regulators clash over ceding supervision to Esma
Belgian and Spanish regulators differ on drive for centralised oversight of cross-border firms
Why Trump’s latest Truth should make TradFi twitchy
Wall Street is becoming the villain in US president’s crypto movie
EBA guidance prompts banks to rethink CSRBB perimeters
Banks will likely have to expand their credit spread risk coverage following recommendations
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision