Welcome to the first issue of Life & Pensions
The life and pensions industry is reinventing itself. The old days when the business of long-term saving was driven by marketing, and liabilities didn't count, are gone forever. The now-notorious combination of low inflation, falling equity returns and increasing longevity over the past five years has shown the cost of risk management failure.
Providers have responded to this, using capital market solutions to repair and optimise their balance sheets, and changing their offerings from a marketing-driven to a capital-driven product mix. Regulators have also responded, attempting to restore confidence by moving towards realistic capital requirements. Sometimes the regulators are a step ahead of the industry they supervise, sometimes several steps behind.
The variation in skill and experience is enormous. On one extreme are the emerging tribe of chief risk officers at multinational life companies whose risk and capital modelling skills are arguably equal or superior to that of leading investment banks. At the other extreme are the part-time trustees of defined benefit pension schemes, many of whom are only beginning to appreciate their risk management responsibilities.
While the intellectual arguments are on the side of realistic, economic value approaches, one can partially sympathise with opposing views. Far more than banking, life and pensions provision in Europe is rooted in the social identity of nation states. Rapid change can be destabilising, such as forcing UK pension schemes to sell equities or German life companies to mark to market. Breaking the log jam are governments which realise that generous state retirement guarantees - made either explicitly or by default - are demographically and fiscally unsustainable.
Addressing these problems will require both analysis and argument, and will take time. There will have to be a breaking-down of historical barriers, not only between life and pensions practitioners, but also the silos between actuarial, insurance, quantitative finance, banking and investment knowledge. Even when solutions are found, they are seldom straightforward because they have to be implemented within far-from-perfect regulatory, accounting and taxation frameworks.
In this confusing and fast-changing world, the industry needs an international forum to share experiences, discuss the issues and learn about the new business environment. In the same way that our sister publication, Risk, fostered the development of over-the-counter derivatives markets and bank risk management, now enshrined by regulators in Basel II, we hope that Life & Pensions will perform a similar service for the life and pensions industry.
In the magazine you will find news on important regulatory, industry and intellectual developments. In our feature articles, there will be in-depth analysis of key issues such as capital models or supervisory frameworks, and of financial market or technology solutions. Where possible we will base much of our analysis of these solutions on the experience of life and pensions practitioners as well as vendors. Every month we will profile specific practitioners from across Europe.
At the back of the magazine you will find one or more peer-reviewed technical articles, as well as educational articles. Here, our aim is to create a body of knowledge and best practice that can become a recognised industry resource. To achieve its aims, Life & Pensions needs your support. We invite submissions of technical papers (see page 19 for submission guidelines), and we ask that experts make themselves available as anonymous referees. We invite suggestions and feedback on all aspects of the magazine, and look forward to serving our readership.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Foreign banks can swerve US Basel op risk capital charges
New proposal offers category III and IV banks op-out from regime, but intragroup trades penalised
BoE’s Bailey expects global consensus on FRTB internal models
Isda AGM: UK is reviewing proposals from US and EU regulators before finalising its IMA rules
DRW chief slams ‘ridiculous’ OCC stablecoin rule
Isda AGM: Wilson warns week-long redemption freeze would deter use of Genius Act coins as cash leg of tokenised repo
Dealers push for more revisions to Basel III endgame
Isda AGM: Goldman, JP Morgan bankers want changes on cross-product netting, CVA and default risk charges
StanChart: UK, EU should copy US ‘commercial’ Basel III
Isda AGM: Exec warns divergent Basel III rules will push trading into less-regulated entities
NBFI oversight ‘no longer adequate’, say BdF economists
Researchers call for stronger supervision of non-bank sector ‘before risks actually materialise’
Why Brexit still stirs up trouble for cross-border business
As EU erects another obstacle, banks consider ways around it – or exit strategies
Can US regulators keep Collins happy with one capital stack?
Legal experts say Basel III endgame redraft retains spirit if not letter of the floor