FCStone to post bad debt provision
FCStone Group, an integrated commodity risk management company, has announced it expects to incur a pre-tax bad debt provision of up to $25m due to losses by three domestic accounts, including an energy trading account.
In a conference call on 4 November 2008, Pete Anderson, president and chief executive officer of FCStone, said the company was taking appropriate actions in response to the issue. However, further losses have not yet been ruled out by the company.
It may be possible for the firm to recover some of the loss from the introducing broker under a sharing agreement, but it could not provide details on the amount and timing of recovery.
The company has added to its internal credit risk management staff, in response to the issue, and has undertaken a complete review of its clearing customers’ accounts. It has also employed an external consultant to review risk procedures, processes and systems within the firm.
FCStone has no other accounts with a similar level of exposure or risk to the energy trading account, according to Anderson. He added: “We dropped the ball with this account but the rest of the book of our business is sound and adequately margined.”
FCStone is due to announce its fiscal year end and fourth quarter 2008 results on Thursday 13 November 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities