SEC proposes relaxation of Sarbox for foreign firms
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the US has proposed a relaxation of the Sarbanes-Oxley rules, allowing foreign companies listing on US exchanges an extra year to comply with the regulations.
Under the proposals, small and medium companies in the US and overseas firms will obtain a year's exemption from Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires companies to establish stringent internal controls and for these processes to be checked by auditors.
Christopher Cox, chairman of the SEC, said: “By offering further relief for smaller companies and most foreign issuers, today's actions will allow time for the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to redesign Section 404 implementation in a way that is efficient and cost effective for investors.”
Sarbanes-Oxley, which was passed in 2002 in the wake of the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is designed to ensure that financial results published by companies are accurate. Critics of the legislation have blamed it for pushing international companies to list on exchanges in London or Hong Kong, rather than in the US.
John White, director of the SEC's division of corporation finance, told RiskNews: “This will allow companies to list in the US and then turn to the Sarbanes-Oxley process instead of doing both simultaneously. The extra year will make it much more attractive to list in the US.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities