Basel II op risk survey launched
Global banking regulators today launched their second survey seeking data on operational losses suffered by banks to help refine the op risk proposals of the Basel II capital Accord.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has invited banks to come up with their own ideas on sophisticated ways of measuring the operational risks they face. But lack of data on operational losses has held back progress on developing effective op risk models.
The Basel II Accord will require large international banks for the first time to set aside capital specifically to guard against the risk of loss from operational hazards such as fraud, technology failure and trade settlement errors. Regulators hope the accord will come into effect in late 2006.
The Basel Committee, which in effect regulates international banking, said the survey would collect information on various exposure indicators as well as operational losses. The data would be treated with complete confidentiality.
The Committee said it planned to provide feedback to the banking industry on the survey’s results. But it added this would be done without disclosing individual bank data.
The Basel regulators see the op risk survey as a data collection exercise and therefore launched it ahead of QIS3 – the key third Basel II quantitative impact study planned for October 1.
QIS3 will seek information from banks on the overall impact of Basel II. It will be used as a basis for the third consultative paper on Basel II that the Basel regulators hope to issue in May next year.
They then hope to issue their final version of Basel II by the end of 2003, allowing some three years for banks and national regulators to prepare for Basel II’s coming into effect.
(Details of the op risk survey – Operational Risk Data Collection Exercise 2002 – are available on the Bank for International Settlements’ website: www.bis.org)
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous
SEC poised to approve expansion of CME-FICC cross-margining
Agency’s new division heads moving swiftly on applications related to US Treasury clearing
ECB bank supervisors want top-down stress test that bites
Proposal would simplify capital structure with something similar to US stress capital buffer
Clearing houses warn Esma margin rules will stifle innovation
Changes in model confidence levels could still trip supervisory threshold even after relaxation in final RTS
BlackRock, Citadel Securities, Nasdaq mull tokenised equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel recently debated the ramifications of a future with tokenised equities
CCPs trade blows over EU’s new open access push
Cboe Clear wants more interoperability; Euronext says ‘not with us’