‘Restructuring’ partly dumped as Basel shifts stance on risk mitigation
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of new banking regulation, Basel II, which is due for implementation by the end of 2006, has made a number of concessions in its proposed treatment of risk mitigation techniques in the release of its third consultative paper, CP3, today.
“During the CP3 consultative period, the Committee also intends to explore alternative regulatory capital treatments for credit derivatives that do not include restructuring as a credit event trigger,” the Committee said in a statement.
The Committee added that it would allow banks using the advanced measurement approaches to operational risk to use insurance as an operational risk mitigant when calculating regulatory capital. But this must not exceed 20% of a bank’s total operational risk capital requirement, the Committee said.
But there was less progress in the area of securitisation following industry objections to the Basel Committee’s second working paper on securitisation issued in October last year. “The Committee reaffirms the need for banks to deduct from capital positions that are highly subordinated,” said the Committee. “The Committee views this requirement as necessary in order to create strong incentives for banks not to retain or to assume the risk associated with these positions that inherently contain the greatest risk.”
The earlier-than-expected release of CP3 – albeit already delayed from the Committee’s original timetable – provides bankers with more time to review the 216- page revised Basel II Accord.
The banking industry will have three months to issue comments related to CP3, with all submissions to national supervisors, central banks or the Bank for International Settlements due no later than by July 31. The Committee will then review these comments and plans to issue the final Accord in the fourth-quarter of this year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma denies need for new competitiveness mandate
MEP wants explicit requirement; Esma official says it’s already covered in existing rulebook
US regulators cut FRTB’s IMA capital hit by 59%, Isda finds
Trade body pushes for further changes to cross-product netting, default risk charge
US FRTB glitch could spit out negative capital charges
Effort to recognise risk diversification between IMA and standardised approach went too far
Euronext, LCH back Esma as exchange super-regulator
National oversight hurts Europe, exchange officials say – but some are not ready to accept a single watchdog
Double, but no trouble? CVA capital hit may lack clout
Industry opinion mixed around Basel III endgame derivatives charge
Amid debanking drama, banks try to say ‘no’, safely
A basic risk management tool – the ability to turn a customer away – has become a political football
Erba myth: will US banks choose new capital measure?
B3E gives US banks a dilemma – adopt expanded risk-based approach, or a new standardised alternative
Illiquid assets pricing still needs expert judgement, say banks
EU regulators want more transparency in valuations, but some asset prices remain elusive