Tighten oversight and loosen mark-to-market rules, Basel Committee says
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has warned supervisors to improve their supervision of banks' risk models, but has also echoed calls for a relaxation in mark-to-market accounting rules.
In a consultation paper released on November 28, the committee warned banks and supervisors to ensure that valuations were checked by a separate unit within the bank, rather than by the unit responsible for trading the positions, and said that larger risk provisions would be enforced.
But, it added, regulators should also look more closely at relaxing strict mark-to-market rules under certain circumstances, considering whether markets are sufficiently liquid, whether prices are the result of forced sales, and whether the product being valued is sufficiently similar to the product traded in the market. The proposals will be open for comment until February 6.
The committee follows the lead of other regulators and industry bodies which have hinted at loosening of mark-to-market requirements in recent weeks: in October the US Securities and Exchange Commission re-emphasised the rules on ignoring mark-to-market in illiquid markets, and the governments of the eurozone countries made similar recommendations later the same month.
See also: European governments promise loan guarantees and bank restructuring
SEC to ease mark-to-market rules
US banks call for more leeway on mark-to-market rules
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Credit spread risk approach differs among EU banks, survey finds
KPMG survey of more than 90 banks reveals disagreement on how to treat liabilities and loans
Bowman’s Fed may limp on by after cuts
New vice-chair seeks efficiency, but staff clear-out could hamper functions, say former regulators
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
Hong Kong derivatives regime could drive more offshore booking
Industry warns new capital requirements for securities firms are higher than other jurisdictions
Will Iosco’s guidance solve pre-hedging puzzle?
Buy-siders doubt consent requirement will remove long-standing concerns
Responsible AI is about payoffs as much as principles
How one firm cut loan processing times and improved fraud detection without compromising on governance
Could one-off loan losses at US regional banks become systemic?
Investors bet Zions, Western Alliance are isolated problems, but credit risk managers are nervous