FSA 2008 outlook focuses on SocGen bonus lessons
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has urged investment banks to re-examine their attitudes towards annual staff bonuses in the wake of last week's record rogue-trading loss at Société Générale.
"There are indications that remuneration charges are not necessarily adjusting commensurately with falls in banking earnings. More fundamentally, there is a concern over whether investment banks' [bonus] policies provide the right incentives for risk assessment," the regulator wrote.
"The size of bonuses can be a powerful incentive for staff to focus on the quantity of business they undertake during a year and pay less attention to its quality. There is a concern that in some cases remuneration policies can work against the systems and controls that have been put in place to control risk," the FSA stated.
The regulator's comments could be interpreted as a direct allusion to the €4.9 billion rogue-trading loss divulged last week by Société Générale. According to Jean-Claude Marin, the prosecutor leading the case against Jerome Kerviel, the 31-year old trader took €60 billion of unauthorised positions on SocGen's equities derivatives desk because he wanted to qualify for a €300,000 annual bonus.
Among other issues highlighted in the report, the FSA noted an increase in the ratio of net value at risk (VAR) to investment banks' tangible equity over recent months, indicating increasing risk is the business environment.
"Unlike previous years, the rate of increase of VAR exceeded the increase in investment banks' tangible equity and by August 2007 the VAR/equity ratio had reached levels not seen since early 2002," the FSA notes.
The regulator predicts that VAR will continue to increase as the impact of last year's market turbulence feeds through the trading cycle.
See also:Shake-up at SG follows rogue trader losses
"He didn't want to tell the truth immediately"
Questions remain over SG rogue trader
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules