Basel Accord finalisation delayed by six months
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision announced today that the finalisation of Basel II will be postponed from year-end 2003 to mid-year 2004. Such a delay was widely anticipated in light of the tone and volume of comments that the committee received to its third consultative paper (CP3), published in April. The comments were posted on the Bank for International Settlements’ website in July.
The principal areas that the committee will focus on, based on the CP3 comments, include:changing the overall treatment of expected versus unexpected credit losses;simplifying treatment of asset securitisation, including eliminating the ‘supervisory formula’ and replacing it by a less complex approach;revisiting the treatment of credit card commitments and related issues; andrevisiting the treatment of certain credit risk mitigation techniques.”
The first item on the list is the most significant, and was the subject of significant pressure from US banks. The committee issued, alongside its announcement, a paper that outlined the “broad direction of the approach that the committee has directed its working groups to develop further”. It invited comments before the meeting of the committee in January 2004.
The committee says that it will also conduct a “further review” of the calibration of Basel II, using national quantitative impact studies and banks’ own statistics. It will “propose additional adjustments to the calibration of the new Accord based on this review”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint