NAB to reopen options desk
National Australia Bank (NAB) hopes to reopen its currency options desk in the "near term", said chairman Graham Kraehe last week, reports RiskNews' sister publication, FX Week .
In order to reopen the desk, NAB had to address a series of risk management failings, including introducing a new policy on limits, routinely breached by the four traders responsible for the losses. Among other requirements, NAB had to improve oversight of risk positions, independent sign-off on pricing models for outstanding currency options, tighter control around internal trades and back-office confirmations, and a reliable procedure for sourcing revaluation rates.
Kraehe said last week the bank is making "good progress" in making the required changes. He said these include: imposing tighter control over market trading; appointing a new head of market risk; adding more staff in risk and redefining their roles; and implementing a new risk limits policy for trading. A spokesperson added that the bank has improved the process by which employees can raise points of concern with the bank.
NAB has also implemented a new bonus structure amid speculation that the four sacked traders entered into ever more risky and unauthorised trades to protect their annual bonus payouts, totalling A$790,000 for all four for the 2003 financial year.
Despite NAB's efforts to get its currency options desk back on track, some feel the bank is facing an uphill struggle after being out of the market for nearly nine months. One options specialist in London said it would need to price very competitively to win back business that will have moved elsewhere.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why