Germany’s hedge fund stance raises concerns
Germany's fourth Financial Market Promotion Act, which was drafted in January and is set to become law in June or July, contains a clause banning short selling during periods of extreme market volatility. This clause is worrying German hedge fund associations that believe German law is already far behind its European counterparts when it comes to hedge fund regulation.
"While the situation in Germany remains unfavourable for setting up hedge funds, the funds will take their business elsewhere,” said Donald Pepper, executive director at Goldman Sachs, who has been working to develop hedge fund prime brokerage in Germany.
German finance minister Hans Eichel called hedge funds a "potential threat" to financial stability. Eichel also called for increased regulation to be imposed on Germany's hedge fund certificate industry - notes linked to baskets of hedge funds. This industry is estimated to be worth Eur10 billion.
But some believe Eichel's call for increased regulation could help the hedge fund industry. Johan Groothaert, managing director of structured products in global equities at Deutsche Bank, which has one of the biggest hedge fund certificate products in the market, Xavex HedgeSelect, said he supports Eichel’s push to introduce a better hedge fund structure. “Eichel’s comments have to be seen in context. Hedge funds have become a more prevalent investment type. If the hedge fund industry develops a regulatory framework it will be welcomed.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
PRA struggles to follow Fed’s FRTB modelling moves
Market risk experts say minor differences in US rules add up to more incentives for IMA adoption
Lifeline keeps Europe’s hopes afloat for single-sided reporting
Despite Esma’s proposal for delegated reporting of trades, the industry may yet get its wish
EU’s plan to get competitive faces big legislative hurdles
Large and controversial legislative package may be too amorphous to deliver results quickly
FDIC relearns SVB lessons in resolution tinkering
Paring back requirements gets thumbs up from some, but concerns linger
Stablecoin consortia may be ‘interim’ step to solo bank issuance
Former Citi payments head and Ubyx founder says all G-Sibs will issue their own coins
Report once: will Esma’s €1bn reforms deliver the full picture?
Critics say plan to merge three reporting regimes will see scant returns, and won’t mesh with single-sided reporting
CFTC accused of ‘double standards’ on compute futures
Duffy questions ‘long review’ of CME’s contract when Kalshi already offers similar product
Europe’s banks can’t agree on how to fix the output floor
Some want market risk excluded, while others push for greater savings from credit modelling